Monitoring by the Commission
The Commission has a responsibility, once
the parties reach Stage 3, to monitor the progress of negotiations.
Monitoring
enables the Commission to encourage timely negotiations, maintain
a public record of the status of negotiations, and report to
the
Principals on the progress of negotiations.
| 1. |
Documents
to be provided to the Commission
Any records provided to the Commission that are confidential to a party or to the table will be received by the Commission
in confidence. Such documents must be appropriately marked as "Confidential".
The parties are expected to provide the Commission with the following documents on a routine basis:
1
As requested by the Commission, where additional information is considered necessary for effective monitoring:
 |
a tripartite
progress report (a sample Framework
Agreement Progress Report is attached as Appendix B); |
 |
copies of side
table and working group documents such as meeting agendas,
reports and recommendations to main tables and tripartite
records of decision where these are produced; |
 |
copies of draft
sub-agreements and agreements under discussion; |
 |
individual reports
from the parties as needed. |
|
| 2. |
Attendance at negotiation meetings
and chairing by the Commission
In addition to reviewing documents and reports, a Commissioner
or staff member may attend a negotiation meeting as an observer,
after giving notice to all parties.
Generally, Commissioners or staff will attend meetings
for the following reasons:
 |
routine, periodic monitoring, |
 |
where the Commission determines
a particular meeting to be critical, or |
 |
as chair, where requested
by the parties. |
a) Routine monitoring
The Commission has a responsibility to monitor
the progress of each negotiating table. Commissioners and staff must
observe and report regularly to the Commission on the status of each
table, and advise on any problems that are or may be an impediment
to progress.
b) Critical meetings
Commissioners or staff may also attend any meeting that
they have determined may be critical in the negotiations. One or more of
the parties may alert the Commission to critical issues, or the Commission
may determine this through routine monitoring. In either case, the Commission
will consult with all the parties before it decides that attendance in addition
to routine monitoring is warranted.
c) Chairing meetings
Commissioners or staff are available on a limited basis
and may agree to chair negotiation sessions according to the following guidelines:
 |
one
or more of the parties requests in advance of the meeting
that the Commission act as chair, |
 |
all
three parties agree, |
 |
there
is a demonstrated need in the Commission's view for
it to chair the session, and |
 |
the
parties provide the Commission with copies of the meeting
agenda and any relevant documents within a reasonable
time in advance of the meeting. |
The Commission will review the progress of negotiations based on its
review of these documents, reports and observations. If problems arise
which may impact on progress, the Commission may investigate and make
a report to the parties, or to the Principals where the issues have wider
applicability, identifying what those issues are and recommending ways
to resolve the problem. Where requested by the parties, the Commission
will provide facilitation services and will assist the parties to obtain
further dispute resolution services.
|
| 3. |
Mandates
During Stage 2, each party is required to confirm to the Commission
how it received its mandate and its process for developing and
revising it during all stages of the negotiations. The process
of approving a Framework Agreement should enable the parties to
confirm, modify or expand their negotiators' mandates.
The Commission expects that each party will have the necessary
mandates to commence Stage 4 negotiations once the Framework Agreement
is approved by all the parties, and the authority to develop and
refine those mandates as those negotiations progress. |
| 4. |
Resolving First Nation overlaps
The First Nation is expected to implement its agreed process for
resolving overlaps. If it is anticipated that overlaps will impact
heavily on Agreement in Principle negotiations, the First Nation
will be expected to focus on these issues early in the process.
The general policy on Dispute Resolution applies to overlap disputes.
Where an overlap dispute has been resolved, the First Nation
must provide the Commission with a copy of its agreement once
it has been approved and signed. The Commission will inform Canada
and British Columbia when this occurs.
Where overlaps are unresolved at the end of Stage 3, the First
Nation must provide the Commission with a written report on the
overlap. This report should generally describe the type of territory
and traditional uses, identify the extent of the overlap in relation
to the traditional territory, assess the potential impact on the
negotiations, and explain how its dispute resolution process is
working and the potential for settlement.
Transitional: Those First Nations currently in Stage 3 that
completed Stage 2 in accordance with the Commission's previous
Policies and Procedures (March 28, 1996), must comply as soon
as practicable with Stage 2 criterion 7 set out in this document.
Commission staff will be monitoring these requirements throughout
Stage 3. |
| 5. |
Canada's and B.C.'s Consultation mechanisms
The consultation mechanisms initiated during Stage 2 should become
fully operational in Stage 3. Where regional and local advisory
committees have been established, all members should be appointed
and their work coordinated in a timely way with the treaty negotiations
and mandate development processes of Canada and British Columbia.
Canada and B.C. must advise the Commission of the full membership
and structure of their advisory committees, and any changes to
the consultation mechanisms. They must also provide the Commission
with the agendas for meetings of the Treaty Negotiation Advisory
Committee and each regional and local advisory committee. |
|
| 6. |
Local and regional Public Information
Program
The B.C. Claims Task Force recommended that the parties in each
negotiation jointly undertake a public information program. It is expected
that these local or regional programs be fully operational during Stage 3.
The parties may decide among themselves on the best manner
to carry out this task. Public information activities should be undertaken
in communities within the First Nation's traditional territory,
and elsewhere as the parties may agree.
The parties must periodically advise the Commission by
letter of the activities of their joint public information
program. |
|
| 7. |
Tripartite workplan
The parties must develop a tripartite workplan for Stage 4 activities.
This is the parties' plan which lists the tasks to be undertaken during Agreement
in Principle negotiations, how those tasks will be carried out and the time
required for each. It should be a realistic plan with sufficient detail to
be a useful tool for the parties and for the Commission. The workplan must
include a meeting schedule and a target time frame for completing Stage 4.
The Commission will assist the parties to develop a workplan where required.
It is recognized that the workplan is a working document that will need to
be regularly revised as negotiations proceed.
The parties must file with the Commission copies of their tripartite
workplan for Stage 4, as amended from time to time. The workplan
will give the Commission an outline against which to monitor
the progress of the negotiations. A sample workplan is attached as Appendix C. |
|
|